Did Buddhism influence Stoicism?

Both teach nonattachment, impermanence, and interconnectedness.

Both advise self-control, especially when strong emotions are involved.

Both teach that how we think about things determines how we experience life.

Both say that we create our own suffering by constantly yearning for more while failing to appreciate what we have.

And most of all, both place a strong emphasis on virtuous thoughts and actions.

But there are differences as well. Stoicism focuses on reason rather than mysticism. Concepts like Nirvana and rebirth are absent from Stoicism, as is the Buddhist practice of meditation.

The historical record is scant. I created this crude timeline to show the key interactions between Greek and Buddhist cultures:





You’ll notice that there is no known interactions between Buddhists and Stoics in ancient times. Stoicism grew out of Cynicism, however, and Cynic philosopher Onesicritus did interact with Indian ascetics after Alexander the Great reached the Indus River. We don’t know if these Indian ascetics were Buddhist, though they could have been. Besides, Cynicism had independently developed asceticism and non-attachment prior to contact with the East.

After Alexander’s empire split into smaller empires, Indo-Greek King Menander I became a Buddhist. And through trade routes it’s possible that some Buddhist ideas made their way back to Greece. And Caesar Augustus is known to have met with a Buddhist Indian king. A century and a half later the Stoic philosophy of Emperor Marcus Aurelius emphasized impermanence and interconnectedness.

But this is all circumstantial. It’s possible that Buddhist thought had an indirect influence on Stoicism, first through Cynic contact with the East and later through trades routes. But if so, it’s unlikely that Stoic philosophers knew the Buddhist origin of these influences.

Published by Dave DuBay

Dave is a Florida man. He blogs at https://fratresestoics.com. He's also at twitter.com/Dave_DuBay.

7 thoughts on “Did Buddhism influence Stoicism?

  1. Maybe, maybe not, probably doesn’t matter: if there’s an ideal state of maturity for human beings, it can be discovered by independent parties – if I recall, flight was discovered at similar dates, on different continents. Though I don’t know much about either system, I’m familiar enough to say they both have insight into the legitimate ideal state – though I know Buddhism to have a substantial superstitious following, I’m not certain whether or not it’s origins were based in solid reasoning.

    You may find this useful: “Apophenia”


  2. Thank you for this article. Though it is very hard to find any historical of influence (or no influence) I like to correct few of your statements.

    “Stoicism focuses on reason rather than mysticism. Concepts like Nirvana and rebirth are absent from Stoicism, as is the Buddhist practice of meditation.”

    I recognize you have no first hand understanding of Buddha’s teaching. While some Buddhist traditions are mystical, the Buddha’s Teaching is absolutely not. Buddha was teaching a direct knowledge on the experience as such. It is not empty belief, not even “special mystical” experience. And Nibbana only means ending of greed, aversion and ignorance. It is not kind of universal space.

    Also historically: we have records that Buddhist monks went on the silk route from India to China and also from India to Greece and present time Egypt before the time of Stoicism.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: